tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post1850355023220195105..comments2024-03-12T10:25:00.985+08:00Comments on 取之有道: 股息投資法實際例子止凡http://www.blogger.com/profile/13815373715261739551noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post-87996510760533554182013-12-07T12:21:31.320+08:002013-12-07T12:21:31.320+08:00追求自由兄,絕對同意,風險一定是有的,什麼也不做也會世界大戰,路馬路都會被車撞死,只是看高低如何。追求自由兄,絕對同意,風險一定是有的,什麼也不做也會世界大戰,路馬路都會被車撞死,只是看高低如何。止凡https://www.blogger.com/profile/13815373715261739551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post-9337743545196407922013-12-07T12:19:14.477+08:002013-12-07T12:19:14.477+08:00ccwhk兄,這正是我的意思,就算投資同一家公司,小股東所面對的風險永遠大於大股東,因為控制權問題,...ccwhk兄,這正是我的意思,就算投資同一家公司,小股東所面對的風險永遠大於大股東,因為控制權問題,所以富爸爸作者喜歡投資自己的公司及房地產。止凡https://www.blogger.com/profile/13815373715261739551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post-48531514399221725612013-12-07T11:06:15.458+08:002013-12-07T11:06:15.458+08:00就算是大股東可以控制公司運作,也不代表可以避過風險,否則大股東基本上不會做賭身家的行為,很多時是自以...就算是大股東可以控制公司運作,也不代表可以避過風險,否則大股東基本上不會做賭身家的行為,很多時是自以為是低風險,不過出乎意料之外,黑天鵝出現......<br />只是大股東及管理層的行為受到公眾注目,而不能隨便增減持。<br />我們散戶更要明哲保身。<br />追求自由https://www.blogger.com/profile/09967275701445811711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post-88221242389188055932013-12-07T02:33:12.072+08:002013-12-07T02:33:12.072+08:00Absolutely agree with 止凡!!
unless you can have all...Absolutely agree with 止凡!!<br />unless you can have all the money to privatize a listed company, the so call value company (price = 50% of NAV), (if no div is paid out), may still not a gd investment...Since all the cash can suddenly be "transferred" to other party like major shareholders (via buying asset from him), paying the high salary to major shareholders, etc...<br /><br />that is the reason why we need to diversify our investment becos we are quite 100% sure we may be buying one of those companies which looks good in the past but suddenly went very worse in 1-2 years....<br /><br />example, 0008, 005, 945, 330, Nokia, ....Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05980857410261187892noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post-69105525141628405042013-12-07T00:57:54.508+08:002013-12-07T00:57:54.508+08:00看來兩位都贊成某程度上的分散投資,我對這個概念是開放的,需要分散與否,其實視乎風險,然而風險除了來自...看來兩位都贊成某程度上的分散投資,我對這個概念是開放的,需要分散與否,其實視乎風險,然而風險除了來自對投資項目的了解之外,還有對投資項目的控制性。<br /><br />如果是股票投資,假設有足夠的了解,但還是欠缺一定的控制權,只要你比較於公司大股東或物業投資就能明白,後兩者很少需要靠分散投資。<br /><br />這是我的一點點觀察,例如就算對匯控了解十足,小股東還是控制不了管理層作出損害公司盈利的決定,有時小股東連這些決定都不知情,這些都是風險所在。止凡https://www.blogger.com/profile/13815373715261739551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post-84965397227817085732013-12-07T00:48:50.561+08:002013-12-07T00:48:50.561+08:00加油,努力。加油,努力。止凡https://www.blogger.com/profile/13815373715261739551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post-50849868300796569212013-12-07T00:48:25.231+08:002013-12-07T00:48:25.231+08:00其實概念比起精準的計算更加重要,對於過去的虛擬回報不用太認真,各位自己可以加以研究,多謝分享。其實概念比起精準的計算更加重要,對於過去的虛擬回報不用太認真,各位自己可以加以研究,多謝分享。止凡https://www.blogger.com/profile/13815373715261739551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post-16187112541433398422013-12-07T00:45:21.766+08:002013-12-07T00:45:21.766+08:00看來你對內銀也是充滿信心喎。看來你對內銀也是充滿信心喎。止凡https://www.blogger.com/profile/13815373715261739551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post-82746118939272432362013-12-06T20:41:04.606+08:002013-12-06T20:41:04.606+08:00不如這樣想吧~ww
假設所有股票都是高風險投資.長遠來說都是有去無回的.(長遠來說我們都是死)
[只...不如這樣想吧~ww<br />假設所有股票都是高風險投資.長遠來說都是有去無回的.(長遠來說我們都是死)<br />[只是問題是那個時間究竟可以有幾長?]的基礎下買股票.<br />由於思維/出發點不同.做法又會不同.<br />假設股票10隻中有一兩隻是蝕錢/吐吐羅屎.剩下的3~4隻打平手/微利.<br />只有一兩隻可以有倍以上的回報.整體組合回報仍然是正數.<br />就算當中有一兩個毒蘋果亦不至永不翻身.好快又可以恢復元氣ww<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post-22810902841201571272013-12-06T11:59:28.188+08:002013-12-06T11:59:28.188+08:00重注一至兩隻,,始終都係危險,,承受的壓力亦好大,,
當然世界上最後賺到錢後才是胜利者,,
但若果咁...重注一至兩隻,,始終都係危險,,承受的壓力亦好大,,<br />當然世界上最後賺到錢後才是胜利者,,<br />但若果咁啱在投資的旅程上每次都係一隻,,<br />只要其中有一次失敗就一舖清袋,,<br /><br />索羅斯名言之一:<br />若果您手上的注碼完全輸光,,那您就真係輸了,,<br />但若果您手上還有注碼的話,,那怕係少量,,仍有機會翻身,,<br />這就是分散的重要性,,<br /><br />以前我都試過幾乎重倉近60%於一隻股票,,最後,,<br />這慘痛的經歷讓我明白分散投資的重要性,,<br /><br />但之後重新改變投資方法,,幸好組合重回正回報且大大跑勝恆指,,<br />投資確實係好有趣的,,<br />互勉之...<br />cleverpeople...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post-29214218966338804062013-12-06T09:27:06.704+08:002013-12-06T09:27:06.704+08:00我正朝向這方式投資,多謝分享!!^_^我正朝向這方式投資,多謝分享!!^_^飛上資投https://www.blogger.com/profile/13588172936591204068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post-33912471710881980912013-12-06T07:21:23.816+08:002013-12-06T07:21:23.816+08:00止凡兄,你如可修改一下09年至13年 以$3.69 計算每年不把股票賣掉 可得利息是每年增加股息...止凡兄,你如可修改一下09年至13年 以$3.69 計算每年不把股票賣掉 可得利息是每年增加股息率 <br />這樣也可得出了賣掉或不賣掉的分別。<br />共勉之Gary1736https://www.blogger.com/profile/08412563446165748649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3886431187196458619.post-84004094761825325712013-12-05T23:13:02.658+08:002013-12-05T23:13:02.658+08:00[高沽低買], 永遠都係講既容易做既難!
鎖定利潤後, 再將利潤儲於內銀都係一個方法[高沽低買], 永遠都係講既容易做既難! <br />鎖定利潤後, 再將利潤儲於內銀都係一個方法理財見習生https://www.blogger.com/profile/06484092317460439705noreply@blogger.com